W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n]

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:55:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=T3d+nd9dyAv+dnjEtgAmRUDfTDNSc9LK9tAmKCr=50pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

> Dropping both qualified and had would help simplifying *labels* (it does
> not change the interpretation).

Note that both qualified and had are the verbs of the predicates. It's
considered a best practice in OWL to have verbs as the root of property
names so that statements read like sentences.

Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 03:56:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:14 UTC