W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n]

From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:55:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAtgn=T3d+nd9dyAv+dnjEtgAmRUDfTDNSc9LK9tAmKCr=50pg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

> Dropping both qualified and had would help simplifying *labels* (it does
> not change the interpretation).
>

Note that both qualified and had are the verbs of the predicates. It's
considered a best practice in OWL to have verbs as the root of property
names so that statements read like sentences.

Jim
-- 
Jim McCusker
Programmer Analyst
Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics
Yale School of Medicine
james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330
http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu

PhD Student
Tetherless World Constellation
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
mccusj@cs.rpi.edu
http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 03:56:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT