W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation

From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 21:06:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAExK0DdRExjP1cmObeK7PXrHC2aL+L=zHaCBNXnGJK5qtVHWwA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Cc: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Stephen,
this issue is now OPEN. As Tim already asked, do you have a better
suggestion for "Quotation"?

Thanks,
Daniel

2012/3/28 Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>

> Stephen,
>
> Thanks for pointing this out.
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 8:27 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> > PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/320
> >
> > Raised by: Stephen Cresswell
> > On product:
> >
> > I wrongly thought prov:Quotation was a kind of
> > Entity rather than a kind of EntityInvolvement, and I correspondingly
> > misread hadQuoterAgent, hadQuotedAgent property as relating an Entity to
> > an Agent and thought that it ought to be a specialization of
> > wasAttributedTo.  The way it's actually modeled does match PROV-DM,
>
> 2)
> Does this continue to be the case? If so, could you elaborate the mismatch
> that you see?
>
>
> > so
> > there's nothing wrong here, but it might be worth considering renaming
> > prov:Quotation to help avoid the tempting misreading.
> >
>
>
> prov:Quote was the entity in previous versions of prov-o.
> prov:Quotation is named similarly to Generation and a few others.
>
> 1)
> Do you have a suggestion for it's name?
> If so, I suggest raising an issue on DM as well:
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#term-quotation
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2012 19:07:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT