W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April.

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 15:34:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJCyKRo0cqCO99Gqy3Q3hTh2UNiqHDAdCLp8rt3kD7aomdQQ3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Stian,

It would be good to start collecting reviewer responses, maybe under an issue.

Regards
Paul

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 09:14, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> ex:correct prov:qualifiedAssociation [
>>               a Association ;
>>               prov:agent   ex:edith ;
>>               prov:hadPlan ex:corrections
>>           ] .
>>
>> it is strange to see prov:hasPlan, why not simply prov:plan (and similarly
>> for other hadXXX properties).
>
> Because we had a WG resolution ages ago that we would use verbs in
> past tense for edges.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2011-09-01#resolution_2
>
>
> We've ignored this rule for prov:agent/entity/activity as they are
> really a kind of rdf:object for the reified triple.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#4._Naming_style_for_prov:entity_prov:activity_prov:agent_is_RESERVED
>
>
>
> One of the reason for this is that earlier we had some involvements
> (like prov:Derivation) that had both entities and activities, and it
> was unclear which of those properties was the 'real' involvement that
> we were qualifying.
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 13:35:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT