W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > April 2012

PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 20:04:57 +0000
Message-Id: <E1SEnUn-0006N8-GQ@tibor.w3.org>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336

Raised by: Timothy Lebo
On product: Ontology

Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed,

You and the rest of the working group are welcome to review and provide feedback for the internal 2WD draft located at:

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/spwd/for-internal-wg-review/prov-o.html



Per http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.03.29#PROV-O
please consider the following questions in your feedback:

Questions to be reviewed for:

* Does the HTML file provide an adequate overview of the OWL design elements?
* Do the different organizations of PROV-O HTML and DM complement each other, or is it distracting?
* Would any additional comments (or attributes) help you read the cross reference list in PROV-O HTML?
* Are the comments within the OWL file adequate to familiarize with the structure? If not, what kinds of comments would help?
* Should the OWL file contain any links to documentation (e.g., to the DM, to examples, etc.)?
* Can the document be released as a next public working draft? If no, what are the blocking issues?
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 20:04:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:07:03 GMT