- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:32:48 +0200
- To: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Carl, Thanks for the comments. I didn't understand the summary comment: "My conclusion is that all that much in W3C provenance is in LI_Lineage from ISO19115-1 + 2 and the latter is far more complete for spatial data." Is this good or bad? I mean do we map completely to the current Geo spatial standard. Thanks, Paul Carl Reed wrote: > All - > I passed some information about the Prov activity as well as a link to > the draft model to the OGC Data Quality and Data Preservation Working > Groups. Attached are some thoughts and comments on the model - but with > a very much geospatial bias! Some may remember that way back in the > early days of the Prov activity I shared a document 19115: Metadata with > the group. The comments in the attached document are based on the 19115 > metadata abstract model for spatial resources. The comments are very > "draft" and I expect more detail in the future. > Regards > Carl Reed, PhD > CTO and Executive Director Specification Program > Open Geospatial Consortium > www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org> > The OGC: Making Location Count! >
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 15:33:31 UTC