W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Some OGC Member comments on the current model

From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:32:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA58520.3040209@vu.nl>
To: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Carl,

Thanks for the comments. I didn't understand the summary comment:

"My conclusion is that all that much in W3C provenance is in LI_Lineage 
from ISO19115-1 + 2 and the latter is far more complete for spatial data."

Is this good or bad? I mean do we map completely to the current Geo 
spatial standard.

Thanks,
Paul

Carl Reed wrote:
> All -
> I passed some information about the Prov activity as well as a link to
> the draft model to the OGC Data Quality and Data Preservation Working
> Groups. Attached are some thoughts and comments on the model - but with
> a very much geospatial bias! Some may remember that way back in the
> early days of the Prov activity I shared a document 19115: Metadata with
> the group. The comments in the attached document are based on the 19115
> metadata abstract model for spatial resources. The comments are very
> "draft" and I expect more detail in the future.
> Regards
> Carl Reed, PhD
> CTO and Executive Director Specification Program
> Open Geospatial Consortium
> www.opengeospatial.org <http://www.opengeospatial.org>
> The OGC: Making Location Count!
>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 15:33:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:46 GMT