W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

PROV-ISSUE-129 (YolandaGil): Definitions of "Activity"/"Event"/"ProcessExecution" should be more crisp and differentiable in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]

From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:40:48 +0000
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RGxXs-0004Vx-1G@barney.w3.org>

PROV-ISSUE-129 (YolandaGil): Definitions of "Activity"/"Event"/"ProcessExecution" should be more crisp and differentiable in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]

http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/129

Raised by: Yolanda Gil
On product: Data Model

In Section 2.1, the distinction made between "activities" and "events" is very unclear.  They should be better differentiated, and more importantly they should be related to ProcessExecution which should also be better defined.  Examples should be given of all to illustrate the distinctions.
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:40:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:46 GMT