- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:59 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
In particular, I think it's important that any decisions or resolutions proposed are communicated to the mailing list. That's the essence of open standards creation. It doesn't need to be heavyweight. #g --- On 11/10/2011 10:22, Paul Groth wrote: > You don't need scribes necessarily. > > Maybe just some bullet points about what was discussed. Also a message to the > list notifying everyone where the notes are at is also helpful. > > Thanks, > Paul > > Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:56, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >> >>> There seems to be a lot that gets discussed on the OWL call on Mondays. >> >> We usually put notes on a Titanpad and then transfer it to the wiki, >> but not proper minutes, you are right. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2011-10-10 >> http://titanpad.com/CHZAz6Hk8w >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/09/26-prov-minutes.html had chatlogs from IRC. >> >> >> I agree that we should record minutes.. however then we'll have to set >> up a system of scribes, and these meetings can be quite engaging! ;) >> >> Any volunteers for next Monday? >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 15:52:38 UTC