W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: PROV-WG: Owl call

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4E9EDD43.8000408@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
In particular, I think it's important that any decisions or resolutions proposed 
are communicated to the mailing list.  That's the essence of open standards 
creation.

It doesn't need to be heavyweight.

#g
---

On 11/10/2011 10:22, Paul Groth wrote:
> You don't need scribes necessarily.
>
> Maybe just some bullet points about what was discussed. Also a message to the
> list notifying everyone where the notes are at is also helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:56, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> There seems to be a lot that gets discussed on the OWL call on Mondays.
>>
>> We usually put notes on a Titanpad and then transfer it to the wiki,
>> but not proper minutes, you are right.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2011-10-10
>> http://titanpad.com/CHZAz6Hk8w
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/09/26-prov-minutes.html had chatlogs from IRC.
>>
>>
>> I agree that we should record minutes.. however then we'll have to set
>> up a system of scribes, and these meetings can be quite engaging! ;)
>>
>> Any volunteers for next Monday?
>>
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 15:52:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:46 GMT