Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model] from Stian Soiland-Reyes on 2011-10-13 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:36:50 +0100
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAPRnXtk0K31pETOp=J9Ayhqr_7LJ=4PzvLe3jPuUqPNhhn2Fdg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 22:48, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:

> instances, etc, but we probably want to propose a "default" extension
> like owlTime for the basic uses of prov:Time where the finer details
> are not important.

Note - the OWL Time Ontology seems to be abandonware - should find
better recommendation:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2008Jan/0000.html

-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 23:37:38 UTC