Re: Quotation example

Paul,

On Nov 16, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Paul Groth wrote:

> Hey Tim,
> 
> This is cool. You had some questions:
> 
> > Would the prov-wg accept using rdf:value for the string that is quoted?
> 
> I think we don't say. It's not clear how you identify the quoted string. You could quote something else.
> 
> > Would "wasQuotedFrom" be more intuitive than "wasQuoteOf"?
> Seems a reasonable change to me
> 
> > Isn't this just a special kind of derivation? Shouldn't be handled with the core constructs with appropriate roles, etc?
> 
> It is a special case. In PROV-DM, it defines the pattern that the construct represents.


Do you mean by "Constraint quotation-implication" at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#quotation-record ?

1) Looking at it now, it appears out of date (with wasEventuallyDerivedDerivedFrom)

2) When did "wasAttributedTo" join the party?

Regards,
Tim


> 
> cheers,
> Paul
> 
> 
> Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> prov-wg,
>> 
>> During my attempt to rescue examples from the email thread into
>> concrete PROV-O encodings, I found that I wanted to quote something
>> Luc said.
>> 
>> So why not try out PROV-O?
>> 
>> I added a new example attempting to model Quotation.
>> 
>> Some notes about it are at:
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#Quoting_some_text_in_an_email_archived_on_the_web
>> 
>> Comments welcome.
>> 
>> Regards, Tim Lebo
>> 
>> p.s. - I'm in the process of catching up from the last week,
>> apologies for the lag and the out-of-date responses that are coming
>> your way!
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
> 
> 
>