PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/159 Raised by: Timothy Lebo On product: Ontology The DM mentions "type" and "subtype". Should/Does the PROV-O HTML explicitly state that these should be interpreted as rdf:type and rdfs:subClassOf? This is a follow up from http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144 Thanks, TimReceived on Monday, 21 November 2011 16:06:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:48 GMT