RE: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote

Looks fine to me.

Luc

________________________________________
From: Paul Groth [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl]
Sent: 15 November 2011 15:46
To: Luc Moreau
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote

We should. We can rename to

PROV - Access and Query

So prov-aq

pg


Luc Moreau wrote:
> QA ... Quality Assurance ;-)
>
> Do we see PROV in the title?
>
> Luc
>
> On 11/15/2011 03:36 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>> Hi Luc,
>>
>> prov-qa sounds good to me. Any other suggestions?
>> Paul
>>
>> Luc Moreau wrote:
>>> Hi Paul and Graham,
>>>
>>> Do we want to use the PROV  branding for the document?
>>> and prov-xxx for the short name?
>>>
>>> Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/14/2011 08:11 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> This is a reminder to have a look at the current PAQ to see if you
>>>> support it going to FPWD.
>>>>
>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>

--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth
Assistant Professor
Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
Artificial Intelligence Section
Department of Computer Science
VU University Amsterdam

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:13:54 UTC