On Nov 14, 2011 11:01 AM, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org> wrote: > In theory, I suppose one could do this, but I don't like it. neither do I ;) > > +1 (I think - or maybe don't use literals at all - model theoretic treatments of FoL that I've seen don't use literals, just language constructs and names for everything.) That is a promising approach, in a way already done in all PROV-ASN examples mentioning time "t+1", but what about attributes? > ... > But I'm wary of doing this. I Turtle style is adopted, the mapping to XML could be more complicated Yes (for instance 2.5 to <value xsi:type="xsd:double">2.5</value> ), but every mapping does not need to support every kind of value, as in the json typing example.
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 12:22:33 UTC