Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)

+1

(As I understand this is a syntactic modification - also mentioned by GK in
his original mail)

Best,
Satya

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote:

> +1
>
> On 9 November 2011 14:14, Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > -Paolo
> >
> > On 11/9/11 9:27 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> Kind reminder ...
> >>
> >> Luc
> >>
> >> On 11/07/2011 10:48 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> Again, in the interest of simplification, we would like to make the
> >>> following proposal.
> >>> Can you express your support for the proposal, or if you have issue
> >>> with it, explain what
> >>> the concern is.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Luc
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Context:
> >>> Attribute-value pairs are introduced to provide characterizations of
> >>> entities and activities.
> >>> Name-value pairs are used to for qualifiers for use/generation/etc
> >>>
> >>> Proposal: Use a single notion of attribute-value pairs to characterize
> >>> entities, activities, use
> >>>   and generation. As a result, drop the notion of qualifier and its
> >>> associated production.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Luc
> >>>
> >>> PS. A consequence of this, is that we will use a uniform syntax for
> >>> attributes in entities and
> >>>    uses/generation, and hence, hopefully address Graham's ISSUE-140
> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/140
> >>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > -----------  ~oo~  --------------
> > Paolo Missier - Paolo.Missier@newcastle.ac.uk, pmissier@acm.org
> > School of Computing Science, Newcastle University,  UK
> > http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/people/Paolo.Missier
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dr Simon Miles
> Lecturer, Department of Informatics
> Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
> +44 (0)20 7848 1166
>
>