- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:35:19 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
s/RFD/RDF -p. On 11/8/11 9:28 AM, Paolo Missier wrote: > Luc, Jim > > I think Luc is formally right but again, to anyone wearing SW glasses, the examples /look like/ RFD Literals. > So I suggest to state in the section that Typed Literals in DM are expressed using a combination of a string and datatype iri. And > state explicitly that this follows RDF convention but are not to be confused with RDF literals. and give the counter example: > "http://example.org/foo"^^rdf:resource > as a valid Literal > > --Paolo
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 08:35:52 UTC