- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 18:34:14 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
The examples are all RDF literals. I thought that we weren't using any RDF in the DM... Jim On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Tim, Stephan, Jim, > > Here is a first draft of the literal section. > > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-literal > > It would be good to have your feedback. > If you find it's ok, than the literals examples in the document need to be > checked. > > Cheers, > Luc > > On 07/11/11 18:15, Jim McCusker wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Paolo Missier<Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> DM says: >>> >>> 5.5.5 Literal >>> >>> Literals represent data values such as particular string or integers. >>> >>> My understanding is it's always been used in the standard grammar >>> production >>> meaning (eg: http://savage.net.au/SQL/sql-2003-2.bnf.html#literal). Not >>> so? >>> >> >> I think a clearer definition would be: >> >> A Provenance Literal is a "leaf" value. It does not explicitly have >> any outgoing relations (in SW-ish: Is not a subject of any statement) >> in the PROV data model. Any outgoing relations from a Provenance >> Literal is out of scope for the PROV DM. >> >> Jim >> > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 23:35:04 UTC