- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:28:32 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Of. Should have been 'Change the name of "Recipe"'. Jim On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/147 > > Raised by: James McCusker > On product: Data Model > > We chose Recipe to be explicitly clear about the use of a method or plan to guide a ProcessExecution. We should find a broader term that isn't as tied to the cake example. This is what I recommend. We start with the term "Recipe" and replace it with ever more general terms that are unambiguous. We then accept the broadest possible term that cannot be confused with an occurrent. > > My first cut is "Plan". It's short, simple, and unambiguous. I think it's sufficiently general to cover the definition of "Recipe" without being confused with "Process". > > > > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 15:29:32 UTC