Hi Paul, we also discussed propety chains that would inferr the unqualified relationships, but we decided to address the possible issues with the approach before going too far with the inference. So the answer is yes, they can be inferred. Best, Daniel 2011/11/7 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Hi Tim, all: > > This is a really nice proposal. I think very consistent and seems fairly > easy to explain. > > I was wondering if one has to assert unqualified involvement or can that > be inferred from the qualified involvement pattern? > > cheers, > Paul > > > > Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> prov-wg, >> >> The following link reflects the OWL group's discussions from the past >> week about replacing EntityInRole with qualified involvements. >> >> Please have a read. >> >> If you'd like to join our Monday noon US ET (we switched our clocks >> today) skype discussions, please let me and Satya know. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_**PROV-O<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O> >> >> Regards, >> Tim Lebo >> > > -- > >
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 12:37:24 UTC