By "appropriately scoped", I mean "predefined, consciously selected; URIs". the note "refer to an identifier in the scope of a given account" sounds like we are going to permit lazy naming that can be computed in the future, which current named graph implementations do not support. -Tim On Nov 6, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > What do you mean by appropriately scoped? > > Luc > > > > I propose that we require the asserters to define appropriately-scoped URIs for their identifiers. Letting them be lazy up front will cause headaches when actually trying to use it. > > > > >Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 21:25:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:47 GMT