- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 13:38:37 +0000
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Ok, so, what's alternative suggestion ? Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 6 Nov 2011, at 12:59, "Jim McCusker" <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > This is a misunderstanding of a URI literal versus URI resource. When > a URI resource is used, it can link to that resource when it has > assertions made about it. This is not possible or intended with URI > literals. > > Jim > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> Hi Tim, >> >> But doesn't this include URIs by means of typed literals? >> >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science >> University of Southampton >> Southampton SO17 1BJ >> United Kingdom >> >> On 6 Nov 2011, at 01:20, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/142 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: Data Model >>> >>> prov-dm, 5.5.1 Qualifier: >>> >>> "The value associated with a role attribute must be conformant with Literal." >>> >>> >>> >>> Will this prevent PROV-O from using URIs to cite roles? >>> >>> Restricting roles to literals will be severely limiting for PROV-O and semantic web applications, since literals cannot be described or served as linked data, and thus consumers will be unable to determine more information about what the role means. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 13:39:44 UTC