On 12/05/11 09:16, Paul Groth wrote: > >> 3.) Processing step 7 says "government (gov) publishes an update (d2) of >> data (d1) as a new Web resource (r2)". That's inconsistent with >> processing >> steps 1 and 3 where gov publishes a Web resource r1 with RDF data f1 >> generated from d1. Question: Was it the intention that gov now publishes >> d2 directly; wouldn't it be more consistent if gov were publishing RDF >> data f2 which was obtained from d2? > Yes, I think this is an error. The government was supposed to follow > the same steps in both cases just for consistency. Again, provenance is not supposed to always describe all the steps. The presentation was a bit shortened (probably due to the laziness of the authors ;-), but is still acceptable provenance. The detailed version makes explicit the succession d2 f2 r2 LucReceived on Thursday, 12 May 2011 08:35:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:29 GMT