W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-2: proposal to vote on - process execution duration

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:00:59 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi==F+-0MgWYuEFKES=NR_oBykCfsw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
+1
On Jun 9, 2011 10:29 PM, "Paul Groth" <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In the telecon today we almost reached consensus around the following
> proposal:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval"
>
> However, there were concerns that this meant that it required all
> process executions to specify a duration.
>
> I would like to suggest a reformulation of the proposal as follows:
>
> "A process execution has a duration, i.e. it spans a time interval.
> Statements denoting this duration are optional."
>
> In order to make progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for
> this proposal?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 00:37:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT