While I live with the term IVPT as a way to allow us to move our discussions forward, I think it would be horrible if it actually ended up in any of the documents we produce. I'm not asking for any change now, just giving notice that I expect us to settle on a better term when we can see better what we're talking about and what we actually need to say. #g -- Jun Zhao wrote: > Dear all, > > To bootstrap the development of the model task force, Satya, Paolo, > Khalid and I put together a document [1] highlighting issues and goals > to focus on during the F2F1. > > The document is not meant to be definitive. It should be updated and > evolved as discussions raised in the mailing list. We hope this document > could help with setting expectation for the F2F1 and guidance on the > near focus of the WG. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1_Model_Proposal > > Best regards, > > Jun >Received on Thursday, 9 June 2011 14:37:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT