- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:00:14 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Luc Moreau wrote: > Hence, before putting the following proposal to a formal vote, I would like > to get a feel as to whether the proposal would get support, or whether > it needs to be amended. > > PROPOSED: > 1. there is a distinction between process execution and process > specification/definition +1 > 2. process specification/definition is referred to as recipe in the > charter and is out of scope for this WG +1 (to the extent that that matches my intuition about these terms) > 3. terminology needs to be agreed on abstain - it's not clear to me the scope of terminology proposed. From the above, I would say "process executon" and we're done. #g --
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 11:12:39 UTC