W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

RE: PROV-ISSUE-1 (define-resource): Definition for concept 'Resource' [Provenance Terminology]

From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:35:26 -0400
Message-ID: <B7376F3FB29F7E42A510EB5026D99EF205286336@troy-be-ex2.win.rpi.edu>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
CC: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>, <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
> 
> The last sentence of your description confuses me: "small bits of the
general
> case will sneak into an account".  I would expect the entirety of the
"general
> case" to be a valid part of all accounts.  That's what I understand by
"general
> case" (which may or may not be equivalent to the "simple case" from
which
> the analysis starts).  Maybe you mean something else?

Just that questions about who's a (scientific) author of a paper sounds
like it map to files 1-to-1, but we'll find that an assistant made some
grammar changes and is not an author (because they didn't contribute to
the 'paper', just to the text) and we'll have to distinguish these.

 Jim
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 21:36:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT