W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Fwd: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:36:32 +0000
To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|a7b2e469297fc0ecb99663f203ee060dn55Iav08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|1BEEC300-5AD4-48B3-9DEE-E648D7BB93CE@ecs.soton.ac.uk>


Begin forwarded message:

From: Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu<mailto:gil@isi.edu>>
Date: 6 June 2011 17:33:43 GMT+01:00
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>>
Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on

+1

Thanks!


On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

You can send your vote And I wl forward it.

I sent again a reminder to Sandro.

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom


On 6 Jun 2011, at 17:05, "Yolanda Gil" <gil@isi.edu<mailto:gil@isi.edu><mailto:gil@isi.edu>> wrote:

Thanks for alerting me Luc.  No, I am not in the list, I just emailed Sandro again...  I am not sure I can vote, I will try.  Thanks!


Yolanda Gil, USC/ISI
+1-310-448-8794





On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

Hi Yolanda,
... as you're not on the list, yet
Luc

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on
Resent-Date:    Mon, 6 Jun 2011 08:24:05 +0000
Resent-From:    <<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>public-prov-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org><mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:22:30 +0100
From:   Luc Moreau <<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk><mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>>
To:     Provenance Working Group WG <<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>public-prov-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org><mailto:public-prov-wg@w3.org>>



Dear all,

You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at the last teleconference:
"in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance
of a thing that does not change".  Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed concerns, which can be
summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things.

After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged towards a better
proposal:

In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to express the provenance of
an invariant view or perspective on a thing.

What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not change, the thing
itself can be mutable.

To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this proposal?

Best regards,
Luc

--
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk><mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
United Kingdom                     <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm> <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 17:37:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:31 GMT