Re: PROV-ISSUE-1: a proposal to vote on

+1

Best,
Satya

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Khalid Belhajjame <
Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:

>   +1 for "invariant view/perspective on a thing".
> I believe its use, even temporary one, will allow us make progress.
>
> Regards, khalid
>
>
> On 06/06/2011 09:22, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal at
> the last teleconference:
>  "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to
> express the provenance
> of a thing that does not change".  Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed
> concerns, which can be
> summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things.
>
> After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged
> towards a better
> proposal:
>
> *In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to
> express the provenance of
> an invariant view or perspective on a thing.*
>
> What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does not
> change, the thing
> itself can be mutable.
>
> To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for this
> proposal?
>
> Best regards,
> Luc
>
> --
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
>
>
>