- From: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 13:44:26 +0200
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1 (under the assumption that we agree on "thing" for the thing/entity/resource/subject of provenance, which sounds a little bit too physical for me. But that shouldn't be the point here.) Regards, Kai On 06.06.2011 10:22, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Dear all, > > You will recall we failed to reach consensus on the following proposal > at the last teleconference: > "in a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to > express the provenance > of a thing that does not change". Kai, Jim and Satya then expressed > concerns, which can be > summarized as, this proposal provides no route to handle mutable things. > > After a long email discussion with them over the WE, we have converged > towards a better > proposal: > > /In a first instance, to define the necessary concepts that allow us to > express the provenance of > an invariant view or perspective on a thing./ > > What is important to note is that it is the view/perspective that does > not change, the thing > itself can be mutable. > > To allow us to progress, can you express by +1/-1/0 your support for > this proposal? > > Best regards, > Luc > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > -- Kai Eckert Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim Fachreferat Mathematik, Informatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik Schloss Ostfluegel 68131 Mannheim Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 11:46:57 UTC