W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > June 2011

RE: PROV-ISSUE-3 (define-recipe-link): Definition for Concept 'Recipe link' [Provenance Terminology]

From: Myers, Jim <MYERSJ4@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:24:40 -0400
Message-ID: <B7376F3FB29F7E42A510EB5026D99EF2051E4377@troy-be-ex2.win.rpi.edu>
To: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

I think you have it right that we were all trying to distinguish between
the abstract definition and an execution/instance of that defined
process, but I'm not sure I understand 'merging' them. Do you mean
relating them via a process concept (a'fourier transform' process with a
recipe link to some Fortran code and a process execution of that
transform on a particular piece of data? ). If so, perhaps 'recipe link'
is really just 'process link'? Or do we really need to separate process
definition from process formally?




From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Satya Sahoo
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 9:48 PM
To: Provenance Working Group WG
Subject: Re: PROV-ISSUE-3 (define-recipe-link): Definition for Concept
'Recipe link' [Provenance Terminology]


Hi all,

I have added a definition for Recipe and suggest merging this concept
with concept "Process execution" to create concept "Process".







Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 17:25:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:04 UTC