W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_?

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:33:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4EDC8FD9.9040007@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
OK, I accept the change for the next round.  The issue remains open.

#g
--



On 03/12/2011 00:34, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>
> On Nov 24, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/2011 15:42, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>>
>>> PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_?
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/166
>>>
>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>>> On product:
>>>
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html
>>>
>>> "sufficient should be returned to enable a client application to walk the provenance graph"
>>>
>>> Some noun is missing after "sufficient"
>>
>> I read that as an implicit reference to the "provenance information" in the preceding clause.
>>
>> E.g.  "I shall bring you some milk if we have sufficient at home".
>>
>> Does this create a problem of understanding, or is it a stylistic thing?
>
>
> I did not raise it as a stylistic thing.
> I created the issue because this American English speaker had troubles understanding it.
>
> Would you object to "sufficient portions should be returned "?
>
> If it stands as is, I will not object.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 15:01:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:06:51 GMT