Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]

FWIW, http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/ac00854c0c3d/ontology/components/wasRevisionOf.ttl
is the current PROV-O component for revision.

-Tim

On Nov 30, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Satya,
> 
> I trust you were satisfied with the message of 08/22, we are now formally
> closing this issued.
> 
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> On 08/22/2011 10:06 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Satya,
>> This issue was closed, pending review.
>> Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
>> close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
>> or create a more specific issue.
>> Thanks,
>> Luc
>> 
>> PS See note on this issue's page
>> 
>> 
>> On 27/07/11 01:37, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>>> PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/48
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>>> On product: Conceptual Model
>>> 
>>> Revision is a new BOB and not a property as defined currently in conceptual model:
>>> 
>>> isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)
>>> 
>>> The above description is already covered by isDerivedFrom property.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
> 
> 
> 

Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 00:46:09 UTC