- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 19:26:30 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
On Nov 25, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: > Tim, > > Interesting thought ... it seems like a small step towards creating an ontology of provenance-related services. Maybe this relates also to your issue 168 (http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/168)? 1) Can we include in PAQ a recommended owl:Class for provenance services? 2) It relates to #168 in that they both address PAQ :-) The difference between #175 and #168 is that #168 offers _how_ third parties can tell first parties about downstream provenance (i.e., POST) , while #175 offers a type/class for what the third parties _say_ in their POST. Each can be used individually or combined, that is up to the user of this PAQ document. -Tim > > #g > -- > > On 23/11/2011 19:01, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >> PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/175 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >> >> Although we are NOT defining any specific mechanism for finding provenance services, might we recommend a URI for the class of provenance services? >> >> The initial class description for<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ProvenanceService> is at: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/file/0abd4c442b42/ontology/components/ProvenanceService.ttl >> >> This would allow anyone to type there service, making it easier for others to find in "whatever mechanism" they adopt: >> >> <http://example.info/provenance_service/> rdf:type<http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ProvenanceService> . >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 3 December 2011 00:27:00 UTC