- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:05:26 -0400
- To: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc, I think we want to express this pairing of context-uri and provenance-uri as done in the http header case. However, the question is how we do this in the html case. Obviously, we could create a set of metadata to allow this. However, it's not supported by the link html tag. I guess are general approach was to have something that reused already well known bits of html metadata (e.g. the link tag), which lead to not making the binding between the a context-uri and a provenance-uri. Also, this approach meant we had a nice parallel to the http header case. We can look again at this but I hope that it explains the trade-off. cheers Paul Paul Groth wrote: > Hi Luc, > > I think we want to express this pairing of context-uri and > provenance-uri as done in the http header case. > > However, the question is how we do this in the html case. Obviously, we > could create a set of metadata to allow this. However, it's not > supported by the link html tag. > > I guess are general approach was to have something that reused already > well known bits of html metadata (e.g. the link tag), which lead to not > making the binding between the a context-uri and a provenance-uri. Also, > this approach meant we had a nice parallel to the http header case. > > We can look again at this but I hope that it explains the trade-off. > > cheers > Paul > > > > Luc Moreau wrote: >> Hi Graham, >> >> Thanks, you have the same response as Olaf. >> I followed with this comment: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0306.html >> >> Again, it's about allowing applications to make intelligent choices. We >> don't >> offer them this opportunity, because nothing distinguishes the various >> options. >> >> Cheers, >> Luc >> >> On 25/08/11 15:01, Graham Klyne wrote: >>> On 22/08/2011 23:50, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>> PROV-ISSUE-78 (contexts-and-provenance-uris): multiple contexts and >>>> provenance-uris [Accessing and Querying Provenance] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/78 >>>> >>>> Raised by: Luc Moreau >>>> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance >>>> >>>> >>>> We seem to allow for multiple context-uris and provenance-uris to be >>>> provided. >>>> I am fine with this. >>>> >>>> But don't we want to be able to say, for instance: >>>> >>>> context-uri1 provenance-uri1 >>>> context-uri1 provenance-uri2 >>>> context-uri2 provenance-uri3 >>>> context-uri2 provenance-uri4 >>>> >>>> Do we want to be able to express this? Can this be expressed? >>> It can be expressed usingthe HTTP Link: header, but not using the HTML >>> <link> element. >>> >>> I discussed this with Paul, and we agreed between ourselves that it's >>> not a problem. I'm planning to add some more introductory text that I >>> hope will provide some (ahem) context for this. I propose we discuss >>> further when I've done that. >>> >>> #g >>> -- >>> >> -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 04:05:55 UTC