W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [PAQ] rel="me"

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:03:49 +0100
Message-ID: <4E566455.4070402@ninebynine.org>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On 25/08/2011 15:56, Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Ok, I agree with that. So maybe this should be a model discussion.
>
> The main thing is that I think we would have more impact by supporting current
> community practices.

Yes.  Having examples that show how (in best practice doc?) could help that.

#g
--

>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
> Graham Klyne wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> I think we need to focus first on finding common understanding and consensus for
>> a simple provenance model.
>>
>> If we get this bit right, I think the representations for the kinds of use-case
>> indicated here should fall naturally into place. If they don't, I'd consider
>> that a problem with the model. The discovery process is a separate matter.
>>
>> #g
>> --
>>
>>
>> On 24/08/2011 21:31, Paul Groth wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Have a look at:
>>>
>>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1229920&ctx=cb&src=cb&cbid=vamttps342np&cbrank=4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you think we need to support bubbling up more of the information in the model
>>> into the PAQ to handle these kind of use cases?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Paul
>>>
>
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 17:05:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:58:08 UTC