Re: vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)

All,

Please let me know if you disagree with my reorganization of http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts
I think it reflects Paul and Sayta's comments.

Regards,
Tim

On Aug 1, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Satya Sahoo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> I agree, conceptual model and formal model are sub parts of the provenance model (we should remove "data" also from "Data Model").
> 
> 
> Best,
> Satya
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote:
> Should "Data Model: " be "Conceptual Model:" at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts ?
> 
> -Tim
> 
> 
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Paul Groth wrote:
> 
> > The one listed in working drafts.
> >
> > see http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > Timothy Lebo wrote:
> >> Luc,
> >>
> >>> We have moved on since F2F1, and we have a document now.
> >>
> >> A draft of http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/D1 ?
> >>
> >> Is the document one of those listed in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkingDrafts  or http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Model_Task_Force ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> The question is which word should we use instead of BOB in the document.
> >>> The text will subsequently be rewritten to accommodate this word.
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Luc
> >>>
> >>> On 01/08/11 16:09, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> >>>> prov-wg,
> >>>>
> >>>> Are we headed to reverse the decision made at the F2F1, where we agreed that "Entity" was the thing _in the world_ that we were describing with BOBs, and BOBs were the topic of any provenance assertions that PIL would allow us to state?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Tim Lebo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Myers, Jim wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 for entity
> >>>>> *From:*public-prov-wg-request@w3.org <mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org>[mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org]*On Behalf Of*Luc Moreau
> >>>>> *Sent:*Monday, August 01, 2011 4:01 AM
> >>>>> *To:*Provenance Working Group WG
> >>>>> *Subject:*vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Last week, we agreed that there exists only a single concept pil:BOB (name TBD)
> >>>>> as opposed to two concepts (pil:Entity/pil:BOB). The group was also polled
> >>>>> on different candidate names for  BOB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The top three names were:
> >>>>> -*Entity*(total vote count: 11)
> >>>>> -*Snapshot*(total vote count: -1)
> >>>>> -*Identifiable*(total vote count: -2)
> >>>>> Total was obtained by adding +1, 0, -1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We want to produce a revised version of the specification with a replacement
> >>>>> for BOB.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please indicate which of three names above you would like to see as a replacement
> >>>>> for BOB. Only one vote (i.e. one name for BOB) per member.  If you abstain, pls indicate so.
> >>>>> Vote to conclude by Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Luc
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Professor Luc Moreau
> >>>>> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
> >>>>> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
> >>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk  <mailto:l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>   United Kingdomhttp://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm  <http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Elavm>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
>