Re: vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)

prov-wg,

Are we headed to reverse the decision made at the F2F1, where we agreed that "Entity" was the thing _in the world_ that we were describing with BOBs, and BOBs were the topic of any provenance assertions that PIL would allow us to state?

-Tim Lebo


On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Myers, Jim wrote:

> +1 for entity
>  
> From: public-prov-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-prov-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Luc Moreau
> Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 4:01 AM
> To: Provenance Working Group WG
> Subject: vote on replacement for BOB (deadline: Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT)
>  
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> Last week, we agreed that there exists only a single concept pil:BOB (name TBD)
> as opposed to two concepts (pil:Entity/pil:BOB). The group was also polled
> on different candidate names for  BOB.
> 
> The top three names were:
> - Entity (total vote count: 11)
> - Snapshot (total vote count: -1)
> - Identifiable (total vote count: -2)
> Total was obtained by adding +1, 0, -1.
> 
> We want to produce a revised version of the specification with a replacement
> for BOB.
> 
> Please indicate which of three names above you would like to see as a replacement
> for BOB. Only one vote (i.e. one name for BOB) per member.  If you abstain, pls indicate so.
> Vote to conclude by Wednesday 03 Aug 8am GMT.
> 
> Regards,
> Luc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Professor Luc Moreau               
> Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487         
> University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865         
> Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk  
> United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm