Re: Misleading label in prov-aq.ttl prov:has_query_service

Yes I’ll recover my deployment process and take a look.

Regards,
Tim

On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 01:19 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> Wow, this is old…:-)
>
> I must admit the details are hazy. But the ontology files were maintained
> by Tim Lebo on a github repository:
>
> https://github.com/timrdf/prov-wg
>
> if and when he made an update then he had some magic to automatically
> generate the various owl files in different serializations. I have a forked
> repository:
>
> https://github.com/iherman/prov-wg
>
> which seems to be slightly behind Tim's version, and which I then use to
> update the files on /ns.
>
> I am not sure Tim is still active in this. If yes, I hope he can take care
> of this and then we can go from there; if not, we will have to figure out
> how to proceed.
>
> Note that the number of different prov related ontology files are /ns are
> large, and I am not sure how this came into the picture (see the attachment
> below). Hence my problem of trying to 'simply' edit this by hand.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7 Dec 2018, at 06:31, Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stian
>
> Good catch. Yes we should update the label to match the property name.
>
> @ivan - I forgot the process?
>
> Thanks
> Paul
>
> On 7 Dec 2018, at 02:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <
> soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> PROV folks,
>
> In http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl I found:
>
> prov:has_query_service
>   a owl:ObjectProperty ;
>   rdfs:comment "Indicates a provenance query service that can access
> provenance related to its subject or anchor resource."@en ;
>   rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq#> ;
>   rdfs:label "hasProvenanceService" ;
>   :aq "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/"^^xsd:anyURI ;
>   :category "access-and-query" ;
>   :inverse "provenanceQueryServiceOf" .
>
>
> So there's a mismatch between CURIE prov:has_query_service  and
> rdfs:label hasProvenanceService
>
> As this is in camelCase and looks like a namespace term, this might
> confuse people who load the ontology in OWL editors.
>
>
> So which one is the winner?
>
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf
> uses prov:has_query_service and the whole doc uses has_query_service 20
> times, while "hasProvenanceService" does not appear.
>
> I think this is a remnant in the OWL file left behind after this change:
>
> <dt>2013-01-04 13:11 +0000 7b4580bd6d52 Graham Klyne</dt><dd>Fix some
> section cross-references; rename 'prov:hasProvenanceService' as
> 'prov:hasQueryService'</dd>
>
> Should we update prov-aq.ttl (and *.rdf etc) to have correct rdfs:label
> "has_query_service"?
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> The University of Manchester
> https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
>
>
>
>
>
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
>
>
> --

Timothy Lebo

http://purl.org/twc/id/person/TimLebo a foaf:Person.