Re: Misleading label in prov-aq.ttl prov:has_query_service

Hi Stian

Good catch. Yes we should update the label to match the property name.

@ivan - I forgot the process? 

Thanks
Paul

> On 7 Dec 2018, at 02:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> PROV folks,
> 
> In http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq.ttl I found:
> 
> prov:has_query_service
>    a owl:ObjectProperty ;
>    rdfs:comment "Indicates a provenance query service that can access provenance related to its subject or anchor resource."@en ;
>    rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-aq#> ;
>    rdfs:label "hasProvenanceService" ;
>    :aq "http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/"^^xsd:anyURI ;
>    :category "access-and-query" ;
>    :inverse "provenanceQueryServiceOf" .
> 
> 
> So there's a mismatch between CURIE prov:has_query_service  and
> rdfs:label hasProvenanceService
> 
> As this is in camelCase and looks like a namespace term, this might
> confuse people who load the ontology in OWL editors. 
> 
> 
> So which one is the winner?
> https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-prov-aq-20130430/#resource-represented-as-rdf
> uses prov:has_query_service and the whole doc uses has_query_service 20
> times, while "hasProvenanceService" does not appear. 
> 
> I think this is a remnant in the OWL file left behind after this change:
> 
> <dt>2013-01-04 13:11 +0000 7b4580bd6d52 Graham Klyne</dt><dd>Fix some section cross-references; rename 'prov:hasProvenanceService' as 'prov:hasQueryService'</dd>
> 
> Should we update prov-aq.ttl (and *.rdf etc) to have correct rdfs:label
> "has_query_service"?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stian Soiland-Reyes
> The University of Manchester
> https://www.esciencelab.org.uk/
> https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 7 December 2018 05:32:09 UTC