- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 15:47:18 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>, "public-prov-comments@w3.org" <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
On Fri, 12 May 2017 15:41:45 +0200, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > However… I am a little bit uneasy. First of all, it must be recorded > in the errata, that is for sure. But I would also prefer to see some > record of wide consensus that this is indeed what has to be done (and > record the consensus in the relevant erratum) before changing the > ontology files, because we are, essentially, creating a discrepancy > between the standard and the ttl files. I disagree on the need for the errata as it would not cause any discrepancy with the standard (which doesn't even distinguish between Object Properties or Annotatoin Properties). I do agree we could check wider if we're correct in my suggested approach, so we don't do any double-trouble or break something else. I'll raise it on the semantic-web list and OWLAPI list. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes The University of Manchester http://www.esciencelab.org.uk/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Friday, 12 May 2017 13:47:54 UTC