[wbs] response to 'W3C PROV Vocabulary Extension Survey'

The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'W3C PROV
Vocabulary Extension Survey' (Provenance Working Group) for Stian
Soiland-Reyes (Technical Architect / Researcher University of Manchester).


---------------------------------
Vocabulary  Extension Information
----
Please provide the name and url of the vocabulary, ontology or other
extension to PROV.
Name: PAV Provenance, Authoring and VersioningURL:
http://purl.org/pav/2.1/Description: PAV is a lightweight ontology for
tracking Provenance, Authoring and Versioning. PAV specializes the W3C
provenance ontology PROV-O in order to describe authorship, curation and
digital creation of online resources.

PAV supplies terms for distinguishing between the different roles of the
agents contributing content in current web based systems: contributors,
authors, curators and digital artifact creators. The ontology also provides
terms for tracking provenance of digital entities that are published on the
web and then accessed, transformed and consumed. 



---------------------------------
Contact Information
----

Name: Stian Soiland-ReyesEmail: soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk

---------------------------------
PROV Encodings Supported
----
Choose all that apply

 * [x] PROV-O
 * [ ] PROV-N
 * [ ] PROV-XML
Please list any additional supported encodings (e.g. PROV-JSON, PROV-CSV,
etc.) in the free-text area below: 


---------------------------------
Feature Coverage
----
Indicate covered features by selecting one of the following below:
 * 1) I Don't Know
 * 2) Used Directly
 * 3) Extended 

 * Entity: [ No opinion ] 
 * Activity: [ No opinion ] 
 * Agent: [ No opinion ] 
 * Generation: [ No opinion ] 
 * Usage: [ No opinion ] 
 * Communication: [ No opinion ] 
 * Derivation: [ 3 +++ (highest) ] 
 * Attribution: [ 3 +++ (highest) ] 
 * Association: [ No opinion ] 
 * Delegation: [ No opinion ] 
 * Start: [ No opinion ] 
 * End: [ No opinion ] 
 * Invalidation: [ No opinion ] 
 * Revision: [ 3 +++ (highest) ] 
 * Quotation: [ No opinion ] 
 * PrimarySource: [ No opinion ] 
 * Person: [ No opinion ] 
 * Organization: [ No opinion ] 
 * SoftwareAgent: [ No opinion ] 
 * Plan: [ No opinion ] 
 * Influence: [ 3 +++ (highest) ] 
 * Bundle: [ No opinion ] 
 * Specialization: [ No opinion ] 
 * Alternate: [ No opinion ] 
 * Collection: [ No opinion ] 
 * EmptyCollection: [ No opinion ] 
 * Membership: [ No opinion ] 
 * Identifier: [ No opinion ] 
 * Attributes: [ No opinion ] 
 * Label: [ No opinion ] 
 * Location

: [ No opinion ] 
 * Role: [ No opinion ] 
 * Type: [ No opinion ] 
 * Value: [ No opinion ] 
Rationale: All PAV properties are going from the same resource, a
prov:Entity equivalent, going to either an Entity or Agent equivalent.
There are no activities detailed in PAV.

No classes are defined in PAV, so the Entity/Agent "use" is only indirectly
through  the use of subproperties of PROV properties prov:wasAttributedTo,
prov:wasDerivedFrom, prov:wasRevisionOf and prov:wasInfluencedBy.


---------------------------------
Provenance Exchange
----
Is this vocabulary extension generated or consumed by an implementation,
which one(s)?
 Used by:
 * Wf4Ever Research Objects model v0.2 (to be released at
http://purl.org/wf4ever/model)
 * Domeo annotation framework (http://www.annotationframework.org/)
 * Annotation Ontology (http://code.google.com/p/annotation-ontology/)
 * AlzSWAN (http://hypothesis.alzforum.org/)
 * Nanopublications guidelines (http://www.nanopub.org/guidelines/current)
 * Elsevier Satellite format
(http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/download/3636/1862 )

These answers were last modified on 
by 

Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/46974/prov-vocabulary-survey/ until
2013-01-31.

 Regards,

 The Automatic WBS Mailer

Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 16:18:04 UTC