W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > January 2013

Re: 2 Comments on prov-o

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:45:01 -0500
Cc: <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, <public-prov-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <82FF6054-7526-4917-BB33-76A5EE8ABB06@rpi.edu>
To: Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au
Thanks, Kerry!

Both fixed in latest editors' draft  http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o
and noted in appendix http://aquarius.tw.rpi.edu/prov-wg/prov-o#changes-since-cr-prov-o-20121211

-Tim


On Jan 25, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Kerry.Taylor@csiro.au wrote:

> 1.       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-prov-o-20121211/ In section 4 " iteself, "  should be "itself"
> 2.       http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-prov-o-20121211/   3rd example in Appendix B:  Repeats some of the axioms for wasDerivedFrom and adds some that are not defined in prov-o  (viz AsymmetricProperty, IrreflexiveProperty). Suggest the example should confine itself to  annotation properties alone.
>  
>  
> Regards,
> Kerry
Received on Friday, 25 January 2013 07:45:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 January 2013 07:45:43 GMT