W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-comments@w3.org > May 2012

Activity composition

From: Davide Ceolin <davide.ceolin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 22:44:38 +0200
Message-Id: <4293EF6C-EBBD-4EB0-8AFA-7597464D51A6@gmail.com>
To: public-prov-comments@w3.org

I am a PhD student of the VU University Amsterdam, and I would have a question about the composition of activities in PROV. I noticed that it is not possible to explicitly state that an activity is actually part of another one.

Suppose that a given entity is the result of an activity and, in turn, this activity is part of a larger one.

I can represent this scenario with two separate graphs stating that each of the two activities generated the entity, and from them (and their execution times, etc.) I may infer that one is part of the other one, but I can't explicitly state that.

Is there a specific reason for such a limitation?



Davide Ceolin MSc.
PhD student
The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 21:28:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 12:08:58 UTC