Re: wake-lock privacy considerations

Hello,

Thanks, Marta!

I also encourage to look at my recent issue I filled to WL [1]. Thanks.

Best regards
Lukasz Olejnik

[1] https://github.com/w3c/wake-lock/issues/78

2016-07-29 9:12 GMT+01:00 Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>:

> Hi everyone!
> I strongly encourage you to look at the privacy questions Wendy put into
> github as well: https://github.com/w3c/ping
> I created a file "wake-lock-privacy.md” there where everyone are welcome
> to input their feedback. Else do it on this thread and Ill summarize it in
> the document.
> Have a great day
> m
> —
> Security Architect @ Blockstream
>
> mp@blockstream.com
>
> +491703311307 (Germany)
> +14159608938 (U.S.)
> Signal, Wickr (martap)
>
> > On Jul 29, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > During our call yesterday, Marta from Blockchain very kindly volunteered
> to compile our privacy comments regarding the Wake-Lock API.
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/TR/wake-lock/
> >
> > Please review the draft specification and share your views.
> >
> > To get us started, here are some of the questions raised yesterday:
> >
> > - If a web application makes a wake-lock request that is implemented by
> the user agent, what does this mean for other applications that are set to
> allow access to geolocation, NFC, camera, microphone when the screen is on?
> > - Should this feature only be available in secure contexts?
> >
> > Christine (PING co-chair)
>
>

Received on Friday, 29 July 2016 17:31:40 UTC