- From: Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:18:17 -0400
- To: Greg Norcie <norcie@cdt.org>
- Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMJgV7b+UZCJ4uvL93k8nhL=mSARE_=WE6Phog7iF=cgZy=PWw@mail.gmail.com>
Also, taking a look now - it looks like the time won't equally split between the three: The basic card payment[1] would probably take a workday or two to go through (split up over the course of a couple weeks), totally happy to do that The identifiers document is shorter[2] though - looks like the main thing will be shorter, and explicitly breaks down a few options. Maybe someone could take a look and comment on the strengths/weaknesses of each? And finally, it looks like whoever would take on the basic card payment[3] would probably just have to reiterate that supporting of encryption sensitive data like payment data is always a good idea. Maybe [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-request/#dfn-paymentrequest-updated-algorithm [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-id/ [3]https://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-basic-card/ /********************************************/ Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) Staff Technologist Center for Democracy & Technology District of Columbia office (p) 202-637-9800 PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt /*******************************************/ On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Happy to take a look, though did you want comments by the 28th? > Unfortunately it would not be possible to turn around an entire privacy > review by then for me. (Though maybe on the call we can discuss splitting > the review in three so we can get you some feedback more quickly) > > > /********************************************/ > Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org) > Staff Technologist > Center for Democracy & Technology > District of Columbia office > (p) 202-637-9800 > PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt > > /*******************************************/ > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> Christine, Tara, >> >> Today we announced FPWDs of the Web Payments Working Group: >> >> First Public Working Draft of Payment Request API Specifications >> https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/5371 >> >> On behalf of the Web Payments Working Group, and per our charter [1]), >> I’d like to ask for PING review of these early drafts: >> >> * Payment Request API >> http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-request/ >> >> This specification describes a web API to allow merchants (i.e., web >> sites selling physical or digital goods) to easily accept payments >> from different payment methods with minimal integration. User >> agents (e.g. browsers) will facilitate the payment flow between >> merchant and user. >> >> * Payment Method Identifiers >> http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-id/ >> >> This document defines payment method identifier strings so that >> components in the payment ecosystem can determine which parties >> support which payment methods. >> >> * Basic Card Payment >> http://www.w3.org/TR/payment-method-basic-card/ >> >> This specification describes the data formats used by the Payment >> Request API to support payment by payment cards such as credit or >> debit cards. >> >> We also announced a FAQ to go with the specs: >> https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/PaymentRequestFAQ >> >> Please let me know if there is still an opportunity to introduce the >> work at the 28 April PING call. Thank you, >> >> Ian >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/Payments/WG/charter-201510.html#coordination >> >> -- >> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >> Tel: +1 718 260 9447 >> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 22 April 2016 13:19:04 UTC