W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: new security/privacy review questions

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:32:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CABtrr-Wa0ph42Ag8P1MqCc6hX-sgPTvPtDOkK9KVNiktk3F_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Norcie <norcie@cdt.org>
Cc: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
I should say that we have no interest in holding the pen here... I
asked Greg to send a PDF just because I didn't want people to have to
necessarily have a Google account to view the Doc. However, it sounds
like that's inaccurate (anonymous users can edit Google docs).

We'd be happy to throw this up in a Doc... we'd need to be careful
about defacement since we can't control access to PING members, but
happy to do it.

best, Joe

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Greg Norcie <gnorcie@cdt.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I spoke with Joe - he will definitely be in Prague, however we both agree
> it'd be ideal to keep as much of the discussion on list as possible, so
> those who won't be present can give feedback. (The IETF meeting can focus on
> discussing any remaining sticking points / high level issues that need
> debate).
>
> I went through the questions and edited them to try to be more respectful of
> international norms, using language like "personally derived information"
> rather than "personally identifiable" information
>
> I also fleshed out the sections where an explanation and/or example was
> lacking.
>
> (The goal is that each section have an explanation of the question as well
> as a real world example - some questions seem pretty self explanatory but
> I'd rather be a little redundan rather than start to make subjectives
> judgement on what questions are "self explanatory")
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Ambarish S Natu <ambarish.natu@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> If i try to summarize Privacy as a state free from observation and
>> Security as a state free from danger, what will ensure that an individual be
>> free from any observation be it PII or PDI or something else, i have no
>> particular preference.
>>
>> Ambarish
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, 4 July 2015, Craig Spiezle <craigs@otalliance.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1. Agree with David
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> > On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:21 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:28 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, welcome Tiffany, and thank you for sharing your views.
>>> >>
>>> >> Indeed, the scope of privacy and data protection laws (i.e. the
>>> >> definition of “personal data/personal information”) varies depending on the
>>> >> jurisdiction.
>>> >>
>>> >> A common, but not universal definition is:
>>> >>
>>> >> “any information [relating to/about] an identified or identifiable
>>> >> individual”
>>> >>
>>> >> (found, for example, in the OECD Privacy Guidelines, Council of Europe
>>> >> Convention 108 and APEC Privacy Framework)
>>> >>
>>> >> My personal preference is not to use “PII”, but rather, “personal
>>> >> data” or “personal information”, as needed.
>>> >
>>> > yes.  I am quite fond of ‘personally derived information’ i.e.
>>> > information that derives from the actions of a single person.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > David Singer
>>> > Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> अंबरीष श्रिकृष्ण नातू
>>
>>
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
>
>
> --
> /***********************************/
> Greg Norcie (norcie@cdt.org)
> Staff Technologist
> Center for Democracy & Technology
> 1634 Eye St NW Suite 1100
> Washington DC 20006
> (p) 202-637-9800
> PGP: http://norcie.com/pgp.txt
>
> Fingerprint:
> 73DF-6710-520F-83FE-03B5
> 8407-2D0E-ABC3-E1AE-21F1
>
> /***********************************/



-- 
Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Chief Technologist
Center for Democracy & Technology
1634 I ST NW STE 1100
Washington DC 20006-4011
(p) 202-407-8825
(f) 202-637-0968
joe@cdt.org
PGP: https://josephhall.org/gpg-key
fingerprint: 3CA2 8D7B 9F6D DBD3 4B10  1607 5F86 6987 40A9 A871
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2015 15:33:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 July 2015 15:33:30 UTC