W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: new security/privacy review questions

From: Craig Spiezle <craigs@otalliance.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 23:40:37 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org>, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>, Tiffany DUMAS <tiffany.dumas@live.com>, "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <677984D0-BCD2-4377-948D-F2CF0AE2E44C@otalliance.org>
+1. Agree with David 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:21 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 4:28 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, welcome Tiffany, and thank you for sharing your views.
>> 
>> Indeed, the scope of privacy and data protection laws (i.e. the definition of “personal data/personal information”) varies depending on the jurisdiction.
>> 
>> A common, but not universal definition is:
>> 
>> “any information [relating to/about] an identified or identifiable individual” 
>> 
>> (found, for example, in the OECD Privacy Guidelines, Council of Europe Convention 108 and APEC Privacy Framework)
>> 
>> My personal preference is not to use “PII”, but rather, “personal data” or “personal information”, as needed.
> 
> yes.  I am quite fond of ‘personally derived information’ i.e. information that derives from the actions of a single person.
> 
> 
> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 3 July 2015 23:41:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 July 2015 23:41:10 UTC