RE: Geofencing and privacy

ISO 29100/Privacy Framework PDF is available free of charge. 

http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c045123_ISO_IEC_29100_2011.zip (Download)

Not sure ISO 29101 will be helpful. But up to you to judge.

https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec:29101:ed-1:v1:en (Preview)

http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=45124 (Purchase)

BTW, if you are trying to create a web standard, taking the European view on personal data would seem to provide a stronger foundation for data protection.


-----Original Message-----
From: ext Rob van Eijk [mailto:rob@blaeu.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 08:55
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Cc: Ambarish S Natu; public-privacy@w3.org
Subject: Re: Geofencing and privacy


Joe, it is worth buying and reading the two documents. The definition for PII is based on the European perspective on identifiability.

Joseph Lorenzo Hall schreef op 2015-06-25 15:48:
> Is that a publicly-available ISO standard? If not, we're likely to 
> ignore it if we have to pay to look at it. best, Joe
> 
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Ambarish S Natu 
> <ambarish.natu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello All,
>> 
>> Please excuse me, if i am being a bit naive here in my comments. 
>> ISO/IEC
>> 29100 and ISO/IEC 29101 specify a privacy framework/architecture for 
>> ICT systems, which I believe encompasses the work of the W3. Has W3 
>> thought about addressing these aspects of PII as their design 
>> principles. I do not see a normative reference to this work done by 
>> ISO/IEC.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Ambarish
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:48 PM, David Singer <singer@apple.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > On Jun 24, 2015, at 7:35 , Christine Runnegar <runnegar@isoc.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi all.
>>> >
>>> > The First Public Working Draft of Geofencing API has been 
>>> > published by the Geolocation WG:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-geofencing-20150604/

>>> >
>>> > You will see that there is still work to be done on the privacy 
>>> > and security considerations section.
>>> >
>>> > So, here is an opportunity to provide some early guidance.
>>> 
>>> I don’t want to sound excessively negative, but I have a hard time 
>>> believing you can design any aspect of this without solving how you 
>>> are going to handle the very hard privacy considerations.  The 
>>> mechanics of the design seem a lot simpler, and are likely to be 
>>> heavily affected.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> David Singer
>>> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Ambarish S Natu
>> www.angelfire.com/ak4/ambarishnatuatunsw/1_page.htm

Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 14:09:35 UTC