W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: search engines: right to be forgotten, sitemap.xml proposed solution

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:27:39 +0900
Message-Id: <4A2D3B59-1AA8-4092-B905-7E05797F92AD@opera.com>
Cc: Daniel Weitzner <djweitzner@csail.mit.edu>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, rob@blaeu.com, public-privacy@w3.org
To: Joe Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com>

Le 13 déc. 2012 à 05:02, Joe Alhadeff a écrit :
> As I pointed out in the previous post, having conversations of pure technical feasibility without considering legal context may be an interesting exercise in theoretical application but has little to do with a real world discussion of whether the ENISA proposal would be considered as practically or politically viable.

I think there is a misunderstanding.
The legal context is very important. It is also highly cultural and dependent of the countries. It should not be neglected. 

My discussion previously in this thread is not about "the rights that a user would have in his/her interactions with a third party" (which is very important bis repetita), but, about "what are the current and missing tools right now for a user to have more controls on the way he/she shares the data." So far the granularity is almost 0 and 1. I want a full spectrum in between.

Rob started with a simple question on tools with a bad title on this thread.
"Right to be forgotten" instead of "Needs and tools for reducing the footprint".

Hoping it clarifies.

Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 22:28:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:55 UTC