- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:56:46 +0200
- To: public-privacy@w3.org
- Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
David, you "forgot" to factor the "time" aspect into it. The issue is mostly with information that was legitimate at some point. Now we discuss at which point the legitimacy has faded. Your cases (a) and (b) are a problem of globalization (legitimate where?) and judicial (mis)organization (go to your CA attorney and task him to remove russian content), respectively. Again, tools and organization come into perspective. Best, Rigo On Tuesday 19 April 2011 23:40:52 David Singer wrote: > In the first case, I think I am distinguishing true information that was > legitimately public, or that someone legitimately knows about you, from > statements which are either (a) untrue (slanderous, libellous) or (b) > illegitimately held. I think that we probably have recourse against cases > (a) and (b) already. >
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 11:57:11 UTC