W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-privacy@w3.org > October to December 2010

RE: do not track list?

From: JC Cannon <jccannon@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:08:55 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
CC: "public-privacy@w3.org" <public-privacy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DB4282D9ADFE2A4EA9D1C0FB54BC3BD728D9A63B@TK5EX14MBXC139.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
We must first determine what it means by do not track. At a high-level if a company is asked to provide everything they have on a certain individual that is on a do-not-track list they should not be able to return anything except logs required to fulfill certain transactions as required by law.


-----Original Message-----
From: public-privacy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-privacy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Singer
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:00 AM
To: Rigo Wenning
Cc: public-privacy@w3.org
Subject: Re: do not track list?

Yes.  There is a big difference.  If I am on a 'do not call' list and someone calls me, I know.  If I am on a 'do not track' list, how do I know if people are complying?

On Nov 15, 2010, at 6:02 , Rigo Wenning wrote:

> Hi all, 
> in 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/10/business/media/10privacy.html?pagewanted=all&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a26
> there is a suggestion to have "do not tracking" lists following
> the example of the "do not call" lists. They imagine a browser 
> button or a button on the page. 
> This looks like something where a discussion with technical folks 
> would be beneficial for the regulators. 
> Best, 
> Rigo

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 15 November 2010 16:09:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:23:52 UTC