- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:07:14 +0200
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it>, public-privacy@w3.org
I think one of the realizations of the workshop is that policy languages are at best only part of the struggle with privacy issues. PLING seems focused on policy languages (as its name indicates). On Aug 15, 2010, at 14:46 , Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 15 Aug 2010, at 14:39, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> I think W3C does not need *another* Interest Group on Privacy .....I think the time is ripe for a Working Group to develop *real* outcomes....then you will get the *real* commitment if the community knows that a *real* spec will be developed... >> >> The whole world is screaming for better privacy support on the Web...is W3C listening? > > The hard part isn't setting up a W3C working group -- the hard part is putting ideas on the table that are effective, implementable, and deployable. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 07:07:40 UTC